After witnessing her son’s homicide on nationwide tv, Kurt Vonnegut’s fictitious Hazel Bergeron responds absent mindedly, “Gee…. I may inform that one was a doozy.” Within the brief story “Harrison Bergeron,” Vonnegut explores a future through which the federal government makes everybody equal, via absurd devices. Much like different dystopias, the highly effective eat these with out energy at nice value, however what makes this brief story distinctive is that it ends with no imaginative and prescient to resolve the insanity. It identifies the difficulty, making it bigger than life with the intention to horrify readers, but it surely fails to discover a resolution—presumably, this improper stability of energy will proceed on with Harrison Bergeron’s dying.
Whereas The Stepford Wives offers an apparent ethical concern with the killing of 1’s spouse to exchange her with a robotic, the Apple tv collection Severance offers extra subtly with the morality of making folks with the intention to eat their efforts.
Tales like “Harrison Bergeron” take one’s pure incapacity to like thy neighbor and stretch it to its limits to see what may occur. Within the case of “Harrison Bergeron,” it leads to a society the place everybody experiences inhumane therapy by the hands of the highly effective. Equally, in Ira Levin’s novel The Stepford Wives and in Apple TV’s Severance, the highly effective eat the efforts and humanity of the folks they’re supposed to guard. In The Stepford Wives, husbands homicide and substitute their wives with literal robots who cook dinner, clear, and submit mindlessly, whereas in Severance, the Lumon company divides the consciousness of workplace staff, creating two consciousnesses that exist in the identical physique but are managed by workplace administration. Each tales impel us to think about a world the place people societally commodify different people, however ultimately, we’re left wanting an answer to the insanity.
A Spouse Consumed
In his novel The Stepford Wives, Ira Levin presents idyllic Stepford, full with glad husbands, who spend their evenings on the secretive Males’s Affiliation, and submissive wives, who spend their days trying flawless and waxing their flooring. As the latest neighbor, Joanna Eberhart can’t fathom why these girls are solely concerned with their houses, however she finds buddies in Bobbie and Charmaine, who moved into Stepford not lengthy earlier than her. Joanna turns into more and more suspicious and remoted when Charmaine abruptly tears up her beloved clay tennis courtroom (so she will be able to substitute it with a placing inexperienced for her husband) and exchanges all of her private pursuits for a newfound dedication to cleansing her house; a few month later, Bobbie undergoes an identical change.
Whereas trendy language tends to take the time period “Stepford spouse” and apply it to a lady who likes to maintain her home clear and look after her household, this isn’t an correct illustration of Levin’s imaginative and prescient. It’s value noting that he wrote this novel within the early ’70s—a special political panorama from the one we stay in now—and as Peter Straub factors out within the novel’s introduction, “this can be a novel that satirizes its oppressors and their needs, not their victims” (xi). In different phrases, Levin is just not out to criticize girls who get pleasure from homemaking; he’s out to criticize those that eat them.
A Stepford spouse is a commodity, created by the egocentric creativeness of her Stepford husband. The Stepford girls are described as useless and robotic, fixated on the cleanliness of their houses and the happiness of their husbands on the expense of all the pieces else—they drop all of their hobbies, pursuits, jobs, and autonomy. They spend their days and nights talking sweetly to their households, making ready meals, sustaining their houses, and sexually pleasuring their husbands, and whereas their husbands stay like kings, it’s not clear how their youngsters fare (when Joanna attends parent-teacher conferences, she notes that the occasion is ill-attended by both mum or dad, hinting that Stepford moms aren’t concerned with their youngsters). The twisted creativeness of the Stepford males is greatest illustrated when Joanna’s husband, Walter, invitations buddies from the Males’s Affiliation over for drinks. Joanna joins their dialog earlier than realizing that Ike Mazzard, {a magazine} illustrator identified for sketching “dream women,” is sketching her. Everybody falls into uncomfortable silence, the boys are embarrassed, and Joanna receives a “flattering” sketch by the tip of it; the remainder he retains. The lads have engaged her in dialog with the intention to distract her from their precise objective: to design a “dream model” of Joanna Eberhart who will ultimately substitute the precise Joanna. Later, she’ll understand the Stepford males are proficient in vinyl polymers, engineering, electronics, and animatronics, the proper credentials to create subservient robots. The Stepford males are usually not concerned with wives or companions; they’re concerned with making a product that can fulfill their wants with none reciprocal effort on their half.
Sadly for the Stepford wives, Levin doesn’t present any type of redemptive future for the city of Stepford. Ultimately Joanna, on the verge of a breakdown and rightfully paranoid, follows the city’s males to fulfill the brand new Bobbie in her kitchen. Brandishing a butcher knife, Bobbie tells Joanna that she’s going to reduce herself to show that she remains to be capable of bleed–nonetheless human, nonetheless Bobbie. Joanna strikes nearer to witness this proof earlier than we’re abruptly taken to a different day months later on the native grocery store. We’re drawn into the angle of the latest resident, Ruthanne, who sees Joanna buying, her cart and look completely tidy. When Ruthanne asks Joanna about her images, she admits that she dropped it to pursue house responsibilities. Ruthanne is stunned however returns house to speak together with her husband about their getaway the next weekend, which we all know would be the demise of Ruthanne and the addition of one more Stepford spouse into the group. So the cycle continues, with no sign of ending and no resolution supplied.
A Consciousness Consumed
Whereas The Stepford Wives offers an apparent ethical concern with the killing of 1’s spouse to exchange her with a robotic, the Apple tv collection Severance offers extra subtly with the morality of making folks with the intention to eat their efforts. On this collection, workers of biotechnology company Lumon bear a process that leaves them consciously severed, with a brand new consciousness current solely inside of labor, whereas their common consciousness exists as regular exterior of labor. Known as “innies” and “outies,” the one has no reminiscence or realization of the opposite, though they exist in the identical physique. The controversy over the severance process is multi-faceted: folks condemn the “outies” who’ve undergone the process as unethical; traders and supporters applaud the ingenuity of Lumon; and (it’s revealed later) inside leaders of Lumon eat the inside consciousness seemingly for his or her private achieve.
The consumption of the inside consciousness is just not instantly obvious, for the reason that process appears to profit those that have undergone it. In an commercial, Lumon describes the innies as relations who share the identical beliefs and are excited to uphold the work of their firm. Mark, the protagonist, initially appreciates the process as a result of it permits him to work his workplace job and neglect in regards to the dying of his spouse for eight hours. Mark’s innie co-workers obtain prizes and affirmations once they do their job effectively, they usually’ve come to just accept that life inside Lumon is all they keep in mind.
When Helly is launched, her discontentment threatens Lumon’s steady workplace life and challenges us to think about the ethics of a severed consciousness. Whereas her inside workplace life begins by watching a video of herself peacefully consenting to the severance process, Helly refuses to just accept the workplace life she has been given. She persistently makes an attempt to ship a message to her outie, satisfied that if her outie knew how sad she was, she would present compassion and permit Helly to give up. Believing administration is stopping the switch of messages, she tries to supply her discover of resignation on her physique, in her physique, and even via a damaged glass window, slashing her arms within the course of. Lastly, she forces administration to report her resignation video to her outie, however she shortly receives a recorded response from her outie, threatening and disparaging her: “I perceive that you simply’re sad with the life that you simply’ve been given. However you already know what? Ultimately, all of us have to just accept actuality. So right here it’s. I’m an individual. You aren’t. I make the selections. You don’t.” Whereas co-workers and administration look on unfazed, on this second, Helly realizes that she has no autonomy or acknowledged personhood. Her inside consciousness is on the mercy of her outer consciousness, and she’s going to spend the remainder of her days waking within the elevator, working her eight-hour shift, coming into the elevator to return house, after which instantly exiting the elevator to work her eight-hour shift, till—effectively, we’re undecided when the cycle will finish. That is their lives now.
A Love-Thy-Neighbor Kind of Imaginative and prescient
Whereas John Calvin by no means wrote fictional something (that we all know of), his consideration of the best commandment in Mark 12 means that his dystopia may look just like The Stepford Wives, Severance, and different tales like these: “It’s a mercenary love which the kids of the world entertain for one another, as a result of each considered one of them has regard to his personal benefit.” A mercenary love is one which loves for one’s private achieve versus loving for the nice of one other. It’s a distorted imaginative and prescient of the biblical command to “love thy neighbor as thyself,” first offered within the Outdated Testomony and later affirmed by Christ himself, and it makes use of, terrorizes, and dehumanizes fellow man. In tales that commodify people, we see this mercenary love, this distortion of Christ’s command to like thy neighbor, stretched to absurd limits, and we’re horrified.
I don’t anticipate Severance to provide a perfected resolution at its collection’ finish, however in mild of inconclusive endings, we’re left questioning: the place is the choice imaginative and prescient to the mercenary hellscapes supplied? Severance creator Dan Erickson has supplied hints of what that resolution may appear to be: “I simply hope that folks do not forget that they’re much more vital as human beings than they’re as cogs in an organization. As a result of we’re all cooler, weirder and extra attention-grabbing than the worth we’ve got to somebody’s backside line.” Erickson’s need is that viewers will worth their humanity, the distinctiveness that makes them human.
The decision to like one’s neighbor takes this recognition of 1’s humanity and applies it outwardly, to others. It destroys hierarchy, ranges the bottom on which everybody stands, and calls for that we love our fellow people with the identical dignity that we present ourselves. In God’s imaginative and prescient of neighbor loving neighbor, we’re not left questioning what this love ought to appear to be or the way it needs to be outlined. Based on Jesus, the second command is outlined by the opening strains of the Shema—“Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is one.” Who God is precedes the power for love of neighbor, offering the “why” of loving one’s neighbor—the command offers the “how” of dwelling in a world through which that dignity is honored and upheld.
Levin and Erickson have invited us right into a world the place the biblical cost to like thy neighbor is opposed, however now we’re left questioning: is there one other manner, an alternate imaginative and prescient that attracts out what the world may appear to be if this command was adopted? I’d argue that there’s:
Eager to justify himself the lawyer requested Jesus, “And who’s my neighbor?”
A husband known as to like his spouse grew uninterested in her, murdered her, and changed her with a machine that might serve his each want.
A frontrunner who promised to do good created an inside consciousness, took benefit of her, and violated the dedication to honor her as household.
An outcast occurred upon a person who was badly injured, cared for him like he liked him, and supplied for all of his wants.
However who is my neighbor?
“The one who had mercy on the person.”
Jesus informed him, “You go, and do likewise.”
